Should Public Employees Contribute to Their Pensions?
The pension and other post-employment benefits promised to public employees are sinking many jurisdictions. Should employees help fund their own pensions? The comments this article received are well worth reading.
Bookmark and Share

 s 2009 winds to a close, public employers are still scrambling to balance their budgets, and many see worsening fiscal conditions in the new year. Revenues continue to soften in many states, and costs continue to escalate for health insurance and retirement benefits. Even with wage freezes and furloughs, many public budget officers are scrambling for ways to further cut costs. Finance directors, bond rating agencies and muni bond investors are looking beyond 2010 and asking what these employers will do to structurally reduce their payroll costs in the long term.

Meanwhile, at least a third of California's municipal employers and a large number of other public employers across the country continue to pay their employees' share of pension costs, and require no contributions whatsoever for retiree medical benefits. Their pension funding behaviors are the exact opposite of private-sector employers, who have cut back on employer 401(k) contributions during this recession. I predict this will become one of the key battleground issues in governmental labor relations in the coming year. More here.

What Can You Do?
We're working to bring the financial truth to the elections, and we need your help!

 
Sign up today for e-letter updates and information on how you can get involved in Truth in Accounting.
Where does your presidential candidate stand?
 
Home | About | Facts | News | Videos | Blog | Contact | Donate | Privacy Policy

© 2008 TRUTH IN ACCOUNTING

Nology Interactive - Web Design - Hosting - IT Services