Unlimited Guarantees Get Used
The unlimited guarantees are supporting the two government sponsored entities. There is no evident exit strategy.
Bookmark and Share

 When Charles E. Haldeman Jr. became Freddie Mac's chief executive officer in August, the ailing housing-finance giant had already consumed $51 billion of government money to stay afloat. It's likely to need even more.

Freddie's federal overseers nevertheless have instructed Mr. Haldeman to focus on something that isn't likely to make the bleak balance sheet look any better: carrying out the Obama administration plan to allow defaulted borrowers to hang onto their homes.

On a recent afternoon, employees at Freddie's headquarters here peppered Mr. Haldeman with concerns about the company's future. He responded that they were "fortunate" to have such a clear mission—the government's foreclosure-prevention drive. "We're doing what's best for the country," he told them.

Freddie and its larger rival, Fannie Mae, were among the first big financial institutions to receive massive federal bailouts after the financial crisis hit in 2008. Government officials have been racing to fix bailed-out car makers and banks and are pushing to reshape the financial-services industry. But Fannie and Freddie remain troubled wards of the state, with no blueprints for the future and no clear exit strategy for the government. More here.

What Can You Do?
We're working to bring the financial truth to the elections, and we need your help!

 
Sign up today for e-letter updates and information on how you can get involved in Truth in Accounting.
Where does your presidential candidate stand?
 
Home | About | Facts | News | Videos | Blog | Contact | Donate | Privacy Policy

© 2008 TRUTH IN ACCOUNTING

Nology Interactive - Web Design - Hosting - IT Services